Why AI Technology Isn't Ready for Important Legal Tasks

The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in recent years will likely dramatically change many industries, including the legal sector. However, despite its potential, AI isn't reliable enough for handling critical legal tasks. It's important for law firms to adopt new technologies for productivity and efficiency; however recognizing the limitations of said technology is also important. Until there are further improvements to AI technology, law firms should refrain from using AI technology for important legal tasks.

AI Technology in Law

AI technologies such as natural language processing and machine learning show impressive capabilities in automating repetitive tasks and providing potentially valuable insights. Tools that help draft emails, manage schedules, or provide basic summaries of documents are increasingly common. These applications undoubtedly save time and reduce the burden of mundane tasks. However, the more complex the legal work, the more AI technology's limitations become apparent.

The Complexity of Legal Work

Legal work often involves nuanced understanding, contextual interpretation, and critical thinking. It's in these areas where AI struggles. These pain areas include:

• Legal Research: Completing proper research requires finding relevant statutes and interpreting how they apply to specific circumstances. AI lacks the depth of comprehension and the ability to reason through these complexities in the way a trained attorney can. Furthermore, some AI sources hallucinate and cite cases that don't exist. 
• Client Communication: Generative AI technology are helpful with internal procedures like organization. However, they shouldn't be trusted with tasks that involve communicating with clients. Most clients want their law firms to see them as more than just another check. Communicating with AI will just make it seem like the firm doesn't care.
• Learned Errors: Some AI programs have glitches, bugs, and learned errors. The reliability of AI is based primarily on the large language models used to train the technology. While some firms are taking the time to create their own AI tools, carefully selecting the content on which the AI is trained, some of the flaws are embedded in the actual learning process. Until these issues can be addressed, learned errors remain a potential issue.

The more complicated the legal procedure or question, the higher the risk of negative fallout. While technology like Generative AI reduces the time and effort surrounding certain aspects of legal work, it's not worth it if attorneys have to keep correcting its mistakes. The technology should help the firm, not be a burden on it.

Ethical and Security Concerns

Lawyers need to abide by a strict set of ethics when dealing with a client's legal cases. Meanwhile, AI technology is bound by whatever instructions are programed into it. Problems arise when an AI model ignore the ethical nuances of legal issues. Here are few areas AI technology lacks ethical understanding:

• Misunderstanding Technology: Attorneys have an ethical obligation to understand a technology before using it, stemming from their duty to provide a client competent representation.
• Failing to Protect Confidentiality: AI systems are not immune to security vulnerabilities. Data breaches or misuse of sensitive information jeopardize client confidentiality and trust. Ensuring data security and ethical use of AI requires rigorous oversight current AI technologies aren't fully equipped to handle.
• Potentially Misleading Clients: Misinterpretations, misrepresentations, or oversights lead to serious consequences, including flawed legal advice or adverse outcomes for clients, and attorneys.

The limits of generative AI technology lie in its' very code. Bias in training data leads to biased outcomes. This is especially problematic in the legal field, where fairness and impartiality are paramount. Overly relying on a technology not bound by the same ethical restrictions as actual human attorneys may create negative consequences for law firms.

Outlook of AI Technology 

Most AI programs today weren't built for the legal sector. The few exceptions face the same limitations as their non-legal counterparts. The future of AI in law is unclear. Perhaps improvement increases the technology's scope. Perhaps AI remains in the background forever. If the current attitudes in legal world persist, AI technology's future in unknown, as it is for all other sectors. Regardless, it's highly unlikely AI replaces attorneys in any significant capacity.

Conclusion

AI technology has tremendous potential, but it's not ready to handle critical legal tasks independently. Very few AI programs are reliable and accurate. Its' just too soon and too risky for any reliable assessment of AI's abilities. 

SimpleLaw streamlines administrative and organizational tasks in an all-in-one case management software program.

👉 Want to see how SimpleLaw can transform your practice? [Schedule a demo today.]